| Title |
Interventions for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants: an overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013588.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Souvik Mitra, Willem P de Boode, Dany E Weisz, Prakeshkumar S Shah |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 12% |
| India | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 59% |
| Scientists | 14 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 42% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,089,006
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,184
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,944
of 422,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.