↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and COVID‐19: accuracy of signs and symptoms; molecular, antigen, and antibody tests; and routine laboratory markers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and COVID‐19: accuracy of signs and symptoms; molecular, antigen, and antibody tests; and routine laboratory markers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013596
Authors

Jonathan J Deeks, Jacqueline Dinnes, Yemisi Takwoingi, Clare Davenport, Mariska MG Leeflang, René Spijker, Lotty Hooft, Ann Van den Bruel, Devy Emperador, Sabine Dittrich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 143 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Master 14 10%
Other 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 42 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 46 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2021.
All research outputs
#14,659,707
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,103
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,329
of 405,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#134
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.