| Title |
Convalescent plasma for people with COVID‐19: a living systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013600.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire Iannizzi, Khai Li Chai, Vanessa Piechotta, Sarah J Valk, Catherine Kimber, Ina Monsef, Erica M Wood, Abigail A Lamikanra, David J Roberts, Zoe McQuilten, Cynthia So-Osman, Aikaj Jindal, Nora Cryns, Lise J Estcourt, Nina Kreuzberger, Nicole Skoetz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 3 | 10% |
| Germany | 2 | 7% |
| Mauritius | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 21% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,999,997
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,148
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,794
of 478,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.