| Title |
Carnitine supplements for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013601.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Norihiro Nishioka, Yan Luo, Takuya Taniguchi, Tsuyoshi Ohnishi, Miho Kimachi, Roland Ck Ng, Norio Watanabe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 16% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,136,361
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,307
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,925
of 486,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.