| Title |
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013652.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tilly Fox, Julia Geppert, Jacqueline Dinnes, Katie Scandrett, Jacob Bigio, Giorgia Sulis, Dineshani Hettiarachchi, Yasith Mathangasinghe, Praveen Weeratunga, Dakshitha Wickramasinghe, Hanna Bergman, Brian S Buckley, Katrin Probyn, Yanina Sguassero, Clare Davenport, Jane Cunningham, Sabine Dittrich, Devy Emperador, Lotty Hooft, Mariska MG Leeflang, Matthew DF McInnes, René Spijker, Thomas Struyf, Ann Van den Bruel, Jan Y Verbakel, Yemisi Takwoingi, Sian Taylor-Phillips, Jonathan J Deeks, Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 60% |
| Scientists | 7 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 84 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 88 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,197,163
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,512
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,754
of 492,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.