| Title |
Travel‐related control measures to contain the COVID‐19 pandemic: a rapid review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013717 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacob Burns, Ani Movsisyan, Jan M Stratil, Michaela Coenen, Karl Mf Emmert-Fees, Karin Geffert, Sabine Hoffmann, Olaf Horstick, Michael Laxy, Lisa M Pfadenhauer, Peter von Philipsborn, Kerstin Sell, Stephan Voss, Eva Rehfuess |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 123 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 8% |
| Germany | 8 | 7% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Mexico | 4 | 3% |
| Italy | 4 | 3% |
| El Salvador | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 60 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 93 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 13% |
| Scientists | 11 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 199 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 77 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 81 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 186. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#218,485
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#368
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,634
of 417,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.