↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Selected laboratory‐based biomarkers for assessing vitamin A deficiency in at‐risk individuals

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Selected laboratory‐based biomarkers for assessing vitamin A deficiency in at‐risk individuals
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013742
Authors

Bryan M Gannon, Susannah Colt, Lisa M Rogers, Maria Nieves Garcia-Casal, Ricardo X Martinez, Lucero Lopez-Perez, Kate Ghezzi-Kopel, Saurabh Mehta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Other 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 14%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2020.
All research outputs
#15,578,661
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,394
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,417
of 436,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#138
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.