| Title |
Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013756 |
| Authors |
Neil E O'Connell, William Gibson, Andrew SC Rice, Lene Vase, Doug Coyle, Christopher Eccleston |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 23% |
| Australia | 9 | 20% |
| United States | 6 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 48% |
| Scientists | 20 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,363,600
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,925
of 13,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,441
of 439,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.