| Title |
Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed term infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013758 |
| Authors |
Alejandro G Gonzalez Garay, Isabel Medina Vera, Aurora E Serralde-Zúñiga, Liliana Velasco Hidalgo, Mathy Victoria Alonso Ocaña |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 17% |
| Ireland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 11 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 11 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,876,193
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,209
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,835
of 437,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#143
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.