↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Definitions and reporting of hypoglycaemia in trials of long‐acting insulin analogues in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Definitions and reporting of hypoglycaemia in trials of long‐acting insulin analogues in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013824
Authors

Emil Ørskov Ipsen, Bianca Hemmingsen, Lasse Østrup Petersen, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Bernd Richter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,626,548
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,004
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,046
of 518,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.