| Title |
Duplex ultrasound for surveillance of lower limb revascularisation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013852.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Kp Sarpe, Carolina Dq Flumignan, Luis Cu Nakano, Virginia Fm Trevisani, Renato D Lopes, Henrique J Guedes Neto, Ronald Lg Flumignan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Librarian | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#6,686,386
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,354
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,555
of 365,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.