| Title |
Transillumination and optical coherence tomography for the detection and diagnosis of enamel caries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013855 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Macey, Tanya Walsh, Philip Riley, Richard Hogan, Anne-Marie Glenny, Helen V Worthington, Janet E Clarkson, David Ricketts |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 22% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
| Peru | 1 | 6% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 179 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 5% |
| Researcher | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 78 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 34% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 79 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,657,632
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,565
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,653
of 532,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.