| Title |
Caffeine dosing regimens in preterm infants with or at risk for apnea of prematurity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013873.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Bruschettini, Petter Brattström, Chiara Russo, Wes Onland, Peter G Davis, Roger Soll |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 21% |
| Australia | 5 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Turkey | 2 | 4% |
| El Salvador | 2 | 4% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 2% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 62% |
| Scientists | 14 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 12 | 19% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 33 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,224,136
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,537
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,616
of 423,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.