| Title |
Interleukin‐6 blocking agents for treating COVID‐19: a living systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013881 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lina Ghosn, Anna Chaimani, Theodoros Evrenoglou, Mauricia Davidson, Carolina Graña, Christine Schmucker, Claudia Bollig, Nicholas Henschke, Yanina Sguassero, Camilla Hansen Nejstgaard, Sonia Menon, Thu Van Nguyen, Gabriel Ferrand, Philipp Kapp, Carolina Riveros, Camila Ávila, Declan Devane, Joerg J Meerpohl, Gabriel Rada, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Giacomo Grasselli, David Tovey, Philippe Ravaud, Isabelle Boutron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 140 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 11 | 8% |
| Spain | 10 | 7% |
| Chile | 9 | 6% |
| Japan | 8 | 6% |
| Ireland | 7 | 5% |
| Colombia | 7 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 101 | 72% |
| Scientists | 21 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 439 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 11% |
| Researcher | 45 | 10% |
| Other | 25 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 62 | 14% |
| Unknown | 182 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 109 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 57 | 13% |
| Unknown | 204 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#445,669
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#779
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,517
of 468,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 468,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.