| Title |
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014513 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristin J Konnyu, Sharlini Yogasingam, Johanie Lépine, Katrina Sullivan, Mostafa Alabousi, Alun Edwards, Michael Hillmer, Sathya Karunananthan, John N Lavis, Stefanie Linklater, Braden J Manns, David Moher, Sameh Mortazhejri, Samir Nazarali, P Alison Paprica, Timothy Ramsay, Paul MacDaragh Ryan, Peter Sargious, Kaveh G Shojania, Sharon E Straus, Marcello Tonelli, Andrea Tricco, Brigitte Vachon, Catherine Hy Yu, Michael Zahradnik, Thomas A Trikalinos, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Noah Ivers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Japan | 2 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Grenada | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 64 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 66 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,305,159
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,693
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,068
of 393,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.