↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy in people with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy in people with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014675
Authors

Jamie Burgess, Ioannis Petropoulos, Hoda Gad, Sarah J Nevitt, Georgios Ponirakis, Maryam Ferdousi, Alise Kalteniece, Shazli Azmi, Stephen Kaye, Rayaz A Malik, Uazman Alam

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,320,536
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,760
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,015
of 514,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#96
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.