| Title |
Community views on active case finding for tuberculosis in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014756.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa Taylor, Nancy Medley, Susanna S van Wyk, Sandy Oliver |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 27% |
| Malawi | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 3% |
| Nepal | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 39% |
| Members of the public | 13 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 1 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,150,972
of 25,839,971 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,255
of 13,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,625
of 308,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,839,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.