| Title |
Interventions for myopia control in children: a living systematic review and network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014758.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John G Lawrenson, Rakhee Shah, Byki Huntjens, Laura E Downie, Gianni Virgili, Rohit Dhakal, Pavan K Verkicharla, Dongfeng Li, Sonia Mavi, Ashleigh Kernohan, Tianjing Li, Jeffrey J Walline |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| Spain | 5 | 9% |
| Australia | 4 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 31 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 11% |
| Scientists | 5 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 48 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 54 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#811,830
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,540
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,654
of 426,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.