| Title |
Factors that influence the provision of home‐based rehabilitation services for people needing rehabilitation: a qualitative evidence synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014823 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcela Velez, Luz Helena Lugo-Agudelo, Daniel F Patiño Lugo, Claire Glenton, Ana M Posada, Luisa Fernanda Mesa Franco, Stefano Negrini, Carlotte Kiekens, Maria Alejandra Spir Brunal, Anne-Stine Bergquist Roberg, Kelly Mariana Cruz Sarmiento |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 8 | 15% |
| Japan | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 75% |
| Scientists | 8 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 58 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 59 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,106,532
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,234
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,431
of 483,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.