↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Narrow band imaging versus white light cystoscopy alone for transurethral resection of non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Narrow band imaging versus white light cystoscopy alone for transurethral resection of non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014887
Authors

Lillian Y Lai, Sean M Tafuri, Emily C. Ginier, Lindsey A Herrel, Philipp Dahm, Philipp Maisch, Giulia Ippolito Lane

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,336,874
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,010
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,546
of 467,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.