↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Trifocal versus extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses for cataract extraction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Trifocal versus extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses for cataract extraction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014891
Authors

Shokufeh Tavassoli, Hadi Ziaei, Mohammad E Yadegarfar, Akilesh Gokul, Ashleigh Kernohan, Jennifer R Evans, Mohammed Ziaei

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 43%
Unspecified 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 57%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2021.
All research outputs
#15,125,558
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,260
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,778
of 454,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.