| Title |
Systemic corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID‐19: Equity‐related analyses and update on evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014963.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carina Wagner<sup>a</sup>, Mirko Griesel<sup>a</sup>, Agata Mikolajewska, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Anna-Lena Fischer, Miriam Stegemann, Manuel Spagl, Avinash Anil Nair, Jefferson Daniel, Falk Fichtner<sup>a</sup>, Nicole Skoetz<sup>a</sup> |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 2 | 11% |
| France | 2 | 11% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 52 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 54 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,833,524
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,914
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,467
of 494,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.