| Title |
Topical ophthalmic anesthetics for corneal abrasions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015091.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Sulewski, Louis Leslie, Su-Hsun Liu, Cristos Ifantides, Kyongjin Cho, Irene C Kuo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| South Africa | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 36% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,275,605
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,472
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,551
of 361,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.