| Title |
Inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID‐19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015125 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mirko Griesel, Carina Wagner, Agata Mikolajewska, Miriam Stegemann, Falk Fichtner, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Avinash Anil Nair, Jefferson Daniel, Anna-Lena Fischer, Nicole Skoetz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 12% |
| Germany | 7 | 12% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Mauritius | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 18% |
| Scientists | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 79 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 79 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#449,633
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#788
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,315
of 448,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.