↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Masks versus prongs as interfaces for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
45 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Masks versus prongs as interfaces for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raj Prakash, Antonio G De Paoli, Sam J Oddie, Peter G Davis, William McGuire

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Unspecified 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 31 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Unspecified 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 35 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,135,090
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,342
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,192
of 431,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.