↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Adverse events associated with minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) including bleb‐forming microstent surgeries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Adverse events associated with minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) including bleb‐forming microstent surgeries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015294
Authors

Christin Henein, Clarissa Ern Hui Fang, Gianni Virgili, Peng T Khaw, Augusto Azuara-Blanco

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#22,835,295
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,179
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#410,716
of 481,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.