↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biologics for chronic severe asthma: a network meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Biologics for chronic severe asthma: a network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015411
Authors

Iain Crossingham, Rebekah Richardson, Timothy SC Hinks, Sally Spencer, Simon Couillard, Anne-Catherine Maynard-Paquette, Doranne Thomassen, Imran Howell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 6 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Unknown 6 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,975,050
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,694
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,536
of 440,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.