↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Open versus laparoscopic repair for paediatric inguinal hernia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Open versus laparoscopic repair for paediatric inguinal hernia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2024
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015470
Authors

Julian L Muff<sup>a</sup>, Fabian Lunger<sup>a</sup>, Katrin Probyn, Elise Cogo, Stefan Holland-Cunz, Raphael N Vuille-dit-Bille

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,897,007
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,258
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,907
of 250,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.