↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nutritional interventions for early psychosis: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Nutritional interventions for early psychosis: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2024
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015671
Authors

Yuqing Gao, Yikang Zhu, Jiahui Zeng, Jiayi Ye, Yuchen Zheng, Yanyan Wei, Lihua Xu, Andrea Raballo, Chunbo Li, Jijun Wang, Tianhong Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,641,837
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,379
of 13,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,944
of 337,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.