↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

TB‐LAMP (loop‐mediated isothermal amplification) for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
TB‐LAMP (loop‐mediated isothermal amplification) for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015806
Authors

Leeberk Raja Inbaraj, Jefferson Daniel, Mukesh Kumar Sathya Narayanan, Vignes Anand Srinivasalu, Adhin Bhaskar, Priya Rajendran, Bella Devaleenal Daniel, Tephilla Epsibha, Katie Scandrett, Winsley Rose, Yemisi Takwoingi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2023.
All research outputs
#15,003,628
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,747
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,392
of 356,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#99
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.