| Title |
Identifying the most clinically effective exercise prescription for people with intermittent claudication (MAXIMISE): a component network meta‐analysis with concurrent cost‐effectiveness analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015940 |
| Authors |
Sean Pymer, Amy Elizabeth Harwood, Jonathon Prosser, Bharadhwaj Ravindhran, Candida Fenton, Catherine Hewitt, Chao Huang, Judith Long, Marta O Soares, Robert Sayers, Josie Hatfield, Hayley Gordon, Sara Pittack, Joanne Reeve, Ana Duarte, Ian Chetter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,362,206
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,918
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,390
of 222,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.