| Title |
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.mr000008.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip James Edwards, Ian Roberts, Mike J Clarke, Carolyn DiGuiseppi, Reinhard Wentz, Irene Kwan, Rachel Cooper, Lambert M Felix, Sarah Pratap |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 19 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Botswana | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 88% |
| Scientists | 6 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 920 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 890 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 151 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 150 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 146 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 51 | 6% |
| Other | 200 | 22% |
| Unknown | 157 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 304 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 91 | 10% |
| Psychology | 85 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 77 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 2% |
| Other | 132 | 14% |
| Unknown | 211 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#721,446
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,337
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,781
of 122,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.