↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the efficacy of oral ivermectin in comparison with ivermectin–metronidazole combined therapy in the treatment of ocular and skin lesions of Demodex folliculorum

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Infectious Diseases, January 2013
Altmetric Badge
25

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
patent
6 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of the efficacy of oral ivermectin in comparison with ivermectin–metronidazole combined therapy in the treatment of ocular and skin lesions of Demodex folliculorum
Published in
International Journal of Infectious Diseases, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.11.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Doaa Abdel-Badie Salem, Atef El-shazly, Nairmen Nabih, Youssef El-Bayoumy, Sameh Saleh

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of ivermectin and combined ivermectin-metronidazole therapy in the treatment of ocular and skin lesions of Demodex folliculorum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Peru 2 2%
Unknown 95 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 31 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,532,744
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Infectious Diseases
#529
of 4,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,395
of 289,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Infectious Diseases
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.