You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A working memory training to decrease rumination in depressed and anxious individuals: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Affective Disorders, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabine Wanmaker, Elke Geraerts, Ingmar H.A. Franken |
| Abstract |
Rumination is one of the hallmark characteristics of both anxiety disorders and depression, and has been linked to deficient executive functioning, particularly working memory (WM). Previous findings show that working memory capacity can be increased through training. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 8 | 24% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 82% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 18% |
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 33 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 102 | 54% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,771,308
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Affective Disorders
#1,081
of 10,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,291
of 360,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Affective Disorders
#21
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.