You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Juicing Is Not All Juicy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Medicine, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.04.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yeong-Hau H. Lien |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 76% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 39% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#400,980
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medicine
#192
of 7,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,937
of 212,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medicine
#9
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.