You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Update on management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause: A practical guide
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Maturitas, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.07.020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Santiago Palacios, Camil Castelo-Branco, Heather Currie, Velja Mijatovic, Rossella E. Nappi, James Simon, Margaret Rees |
| Abstract |
The term genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) emerged following a consensus conference held in May 2013. GSM is a more descriptive term than vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) and does not imply pathology. However there are concerns that GSM is all encompassing and includes not only symptoms resulting from estrogen deficiency, but also those arising from the effects of ageing and other processes on the bladder and pelvic floor. Focusing on symptoms related to estrogen deficiency, the update provides a practical guide for health and allied health professionals on the impact of GSM on women and their partners, assessment, management and areas for future research. As GSM is a chronic condition, long term therapy is required. Hormonal, nonhormonal, laser and alternative and complementary therapies are described. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Peru | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 23% |
| Unknown | 41 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,228,347
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Maturitas
#634
of 2,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,832
of 274,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maturitas
#12
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.