↓ Skip to main content

Incidence of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children Among US Persons Infected With SARS-CoV-2

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Network Open, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
289 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incidence of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children Among US Persons Infected With SARS-CoV-2
Published in
JAMA Network Open, June 2021
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16420
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda B. Payne, Zunera Gilani, Shana Godfred-Cato, Ermias D. Belay, Leora R. Feldstein, Manish M. Patel, Adrienne G. Randolph, Margaret Newhams, Deepam Thomas, Reed Magleby, Katherine Hsu, Meagan Burns, Elizabeth Dufort, Angie Maxted, Michael Pietrowski, Allison Longenberger, Sally Bidol, Justin Henderson, Lynn Sosa, Alexandra Edmundson, Melissa Tobin-D’Angelo, Laura Edison, Sabrina Heidemann, Aalok R. Singh, John S. Giuliano, Lawrence C. Kleinman, Keiko M. Tarquinio, Rowan F. Walsh, Julie C. Fitzgerald, Katharine N. Clouser, Shira J. Gertz, Ryan W. Carroll, Christopher L. Carroll, Brooke E. Hoots, Carrie Reed, F. Scott Dahlgren, Matthew E. Oster, Timmy J. Pierce, Aaron T. Curns, Gayle E. Langley, Angela P. Campbell, Neha Balachandran, Thomas S. Murray, Cole Burkholder, Troy Brancard, Jenna Lifshitz, Dylan Leach, Ian Charpie, Cory Tice, Susan E. Coffin, Dana Perella, Kaitlin Jones, Kimberly L. Marohn, Phoebe H. Yager, Neil D. Fernandes, Heidi R. Flori, Monica L. Koncicki, Karen S. Walker, Maria Cecilia Di Pentima, Simon Li, Steven M. Horwitz, Sunanda Gaur, Dennis C. Coffey, Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky, Saul R. Hymes, Neal J. Thomas, Kate G. Ackerman, Jill M. Cholette

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,308 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 259 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 12%
Other 22 8%
Student > Master 21 8%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 4%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 106 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 121 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1372. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#9,430
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#100
of 9,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#443
of 460,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#7
of 464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.