You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Megastudies improve the impact of applied behavioural science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-04128-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine L. Milkman, Dena Gromet, Hung Ho, Joseph S. Kay, Timothy W. Lee, Pepi Pandiloski, Yeji Park, Aneesh Rai, Max Bazerman, John Beshears, Lauri Bonacorsi, Colin Camerer, Edward Chang, Gretchen Chapman, Robert Cialdini, Hengchen Dai, Lauren Eskreis-Winkler, Ayelet Fishbach, James J. Gross, Samantha Horn, Alexa Hubbard, Steven J. Jones, Dean Karlan, Tim Kautz, Erika Kirgios, Joowon Klusowski, Ariella Kristal, Rahul Ladhania, George Loewenstein, Jens Ludwig, Barbara Mellers, Sendhil Mullainathan, Silvia Saccardo, Jann Spiess, Gaurav Suri, Joachim H. Talloen, Jamie Taxer, Yaacov Trope, Lyle Ungar, Kevin G. Volpp, Ashley Whillans, Jonathan Zinman, Angela L. Duckworth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 772 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 210 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 64 | 8% |
| Spain | 22 | 3% |
| France | 19 | 2% |
| Japan | 19 | 2% |
| Australia | 17 | 2% |
| Canada | 14 | 2% |
| Germany | 14 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 96 | 12% |
| Unknown | 288 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 434 | 56% |
| Scientists | 285 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 41 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 258 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 18% |
| Researcher | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 22% |
| Unknown | 66 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 42 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 75 | 29% |
| Unknown | 79 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1443. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,603
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#895
of 98,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#358
of 518,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#28
of 925 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 925 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.