| Title |
Classification evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature Methods, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.3945 |
| Authors |
Jake Lever, Martin Krzywinski, Naomi Altman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 15% |
| United States | 7 | 15% |
| Canada | 5 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 54% |
| Scientists | 19 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 227 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 56 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 26 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 7% |
| Engineering | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 62 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#919,783
of 25,397,764 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,200
of 5,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,886
of 380,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#25
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,397,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.