↓ Skip to main content

Little change in global drought over the past 60 years

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1549 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1519 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
Title
Little change in global drought over the past 60 years
Published in
Nature, November 2012
DOI 10.1038/nature11575
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin Sheffield, Eric F. Wood, Michael L. Roderick

Abstract

Drought is expected to increase in frequency and severity in the future as a result of climate change, mainly as a consequence of decreases in regional precipitation but also because of increasing evaporation driven by global warming. Previous assessments of historic changes in drought over the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries indicate that this may already be happening globally. In particular, calculations of the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) show a decrease in moisture globally since the 1970s with a commensurate increase in the area in drought that is attributed, in part, to global warming. The simplicity of the PDSI, which is calculated from a simple water-balance model forced by monthly precipitation and temperature data, makes it an attractive tool in large-scale drought assessments, but may give biased results in the context of climate change. Here we show that the previously reported increase in global drought is overestimated because the PDSI uses a simplified model of potential evaporation that responds only to changes in temperature and thus responds incorrectly to global warming in recent decades. More realistic calculations, based on the underlying physical principles that take into account changes in available energy, humidity and wind speed, suggest that there has been little change in drought over the past 60 years. The results have implications for how we interpret the impact of global warming on the hydrological cycle and its extremes, and may help to explain why palaeoclimate drought reconstructions based on tree-ring data diverge from the PDSI-based drought record in recent years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,519 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 23 2%
Germany 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Other 17 1%
Unknown 1447 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 342 23%
Researcher 324 21%
Student > Master 140 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 75 5%
Student > Bachelor 64 4%
Other 268 18%
Unknown 306 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 349 23%
Environmental Science 316 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 195 13%
Engineering 131 9%
Social Sciences 31 2%
Other 103 7%
Unknown 394 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 335. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2024.
All research outputs
#100,477
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#6,919
of 98,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#412
of 193,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#37
of 1,024 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,024 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.