↓ Skip to main content

Direct conversion of quiescent cardiomyocytes to pacemaker cells by expression of Tbx18

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biotechnology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
282 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
284 Mendeley
Title
Direct conversion of quiescent cardiomyocytes to pacemaker cells by expression of Tbx18
Published in
Nature Biotechnology, December 2012
DOI 10.1038/nbt.2465
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nidhi Kapoor, Wenbin Liang, Eduardo Marbán, Hee Cheol Cho

Abstract

The heartbeat originates within the sinoatrial node (SAN), a small structure containing <10,000 genuine pacemaker cells. If the SAN fails, the ∼5 billion working cardiomyocytes downstream of it become quiescent, leading to circulatory collapse in the absence of electronic pacemaker therapy. Here we demonstrate conversion of rodent cardiomyocytes to SAN cells in vitro and in vivo by expression of Tbx18, a gene critical for early SAN specification. Within days of in vivo Tbx18 transduction, 9.2% of transduced, ventricular cardiomyocytes develop spontaneous electrical firing physiologically indistinguishable from that of SAN cells, along with morphological and epigenetic features characteristic of SAN cells. In vivo, focal Tbx18 gene transfer in the guinea-pig ventricle yields ectopic pacemaker activity, correcting a bradycardic disease phenotype. Myocytes transduced in vivo acquire the cardinal tapering morphology and physiological automaticity of native SAN pacemaker cells. The creation of induced SAN pacemaker (iSAN) cells opens new prospects for bioengineered pacemakers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 271 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 24%
Researcher 48 17%
Student > Bachelor 40 14%
Student > Master 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 30 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 89 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 55 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 17%
Engineering 26 9%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 40 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 223. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#155,073
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#317
of 8,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,005
of 284,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#2
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.