↓ Skip to main content

Measurement of bacterial replication rates in microbial communities

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biotechnology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
117 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
336 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
552 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Measurement of bacterial replication rates in microbial communities
Published in
Nature Biotechnology, November 2016
DOI 10.1038/nbt.3704
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher T Brown, Matthew R Olm, Brian C Thomas, Jillian F Banfield

Abstract

Culture-independent microbiome studies have increased our understanding of the complexity and metabolic potential of microbial communities. However, to understand the contribution of individual microbiome members to community functions, it is important to determine which bacteria are actively replicating. We developed an algorithm, iRep, that uses draft-quality genome sequences and single time-point metagenome sequencing to infer microbial population replication rates. The algorithm calculates an index of replication (iRep) based on the sequencing coverage trend that results from bi-directional genome replication from a single origin of replication. We apply this method to show that microbial replication rates increase after antibiotic administration in human infants. We also show that uncultivated, groundwater-associated, Candidate Phyla Radiation bacteria only rarely replicate quickly in subsurface communities undergoing substantial changes in geochemistry. Our method can be applied to any genome-resolved microbiome study to track organism responses to varying conditions, identify actively growing populations and measure replication rates for use in modeling studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 552 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 544 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 154 28%
Researcher 124 22%
Student > Master 55 10%
Student > Bachelor 40 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 5%
Other 67 12%
Unknown 84 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 169 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 110 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 46 8%
Environmental Science 42 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 3%
Other 61 11%
Unknown 109 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#444,279
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#1,009
of 8,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,550
of 319,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#14
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.