| Title |
Fees could damage public data archives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/502171a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dominique G. Roche, Michael D. Jennions, Sandra A. Binning |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 25% |
| Canada | 3 | 19% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 38% |
| Other | 2 | 25% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,500,724
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#38,336
of 98,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,455
of 223,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#595
of 1,070 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,070 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.