↓ Skip to main content

Obtaining genomes from uncultivated environmental microorganisms using FACS–based single-cell genomics

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Protocols, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
9 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
234 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
453 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Obtaining genomes from uncultivated environmental microorganisms using FACS–based single-cell genomics
Published in
Nature Protocols, April 2014
DOI 10.1038/nprot.2014.067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Rinke, Janey Lee, Nandita Nath, Danielle Goudeau, Brian Thompson, Nicole Poulton, Elizabeth Dmitrieff, Rex Malmstrom, Ramunas Stepanauskas, Tanja Woyke

Abstract

Single-cell genomics is a powerful tool for exploring the genetic makeup of environmental microorganisms, the vast majority of which are difficult, if not impossible, to cultivate with current approaches. Here we present a comprehensive protocol for obtaining genomes from uncultivated environmental microbes via high-throughput single-cell isolation by FACS. The protocol encompasses the preservation and pretreatment of differing environmental samples, followed by the physical separation, lysis, whole-genome amplification and 16S rRNA-based identification of individual bacterial and archaeal cells. The described procedure can be performed with standard molecular biology equipment and a FACS machine. It takes <12 h of bench time over a 4-d time period, and it generates up to 1 μg of genomic DNA from an individual microbial cell, which is suitable for downstream applications such as PCR amplification and shotgun sequencing. The completeness of the recovered genomes varies, with an average of ∼50%.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
Norway 3 <1%
China 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 430 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 108 24%
Researcher 93 21%
Student > Master 44 10%
Student > Bachelor 34 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 5%
Other 73 16%
Unknown 78 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 165 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 84 19%
Environmental Science 39 9%
Engineering 19 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 3%
Other 47 10%
Unknown 86 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,380,202
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Nature Protocols
#441
of 2,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,665
of 229,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Protocols
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.