↓ Skip to main content

Cell differentiation and germ–soma separation in Ediacaran animal embryo-like fossils

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
twitter
27 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Cell differentiation and germ–soma separation in Ediacaran animal embryo-like fossils
Published in
Nature, September 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature13766
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Chen, Shuhai Xiao, Ke Pang, Chuanming Zhou, Xunlai Yuan

Abstract

Phosphorites of the Ediacaran Doushantuo Formation (∼600 million years old) yield spheroidal microfossils with a palintomic cell cleavage pattern. These fossils have been variously interpreted as sulphur-oxidizing bacteria, unicellular protists, mesomycetozoean-like holozoans, green algae akin to Volvox, and blastula embryos of early metazoans or bilaterian animals. However, their complete life cycle is unknown and it is uncertain whether they had a cellularly differentiated ontogenetic stage, making it difficult to test their various phylogenetic interpretations. Here we describe new spheroidal fossils from black phosphorites of the Doushantuo Formation that have been overlooked in previous studies. These fossils represent later developmental stages of previously published blastula-like fossils, and they show evidence for cell differentiation, germ-soma separation, and programmed cell death. Their complex multicellularity is inconsistent with a phylogenetic affinity with bacteria, unicellular protists, or mesomycetozoean-like holozoans. Available evidence also indicates that the Doushantuo fossils are unlikely crown-group animals or volvocine green algae. We conclude that an affinity with cellularly differentiated multicellular eukaryotes, including stem-group animals or algae, is likely but more data are needed to constrain further the exact phylogenetic affinity of the Doushantuo fossils.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Germany 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 128 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 22%
Researcher 29 21%
Student > Master 18 13%
Professor 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 36%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 33 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Philosophy 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 303. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#116,544
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#7,808
of 98,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#991
of 264,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#108
of 1,007 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,007 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.