↓ Skip to main content

Sea-level variability over five glacial cycles

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
18 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
351 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Sea-level variability over five glacial cycles
Published in
Nature Communications, September 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms6076
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. M. Grant, E. J. Rohling, C. Bronk Ramsey, H. Cheng, R. L. Edwards, F. Florindo, D. Heslop, F. Marra, A. P. Roberts, M. E. Tamisiea, F. Williams

Abstract

Research on global ice-volume changes during Pleistocene glacial cycles is hindered by a lack of detailed sea-level records for time intervals older than the last interglacial. Here we present the first robustly dated, continuous and highly resolved records of Red Sea sea level and rates of sea-level change over the last 500,000 years, based on tight synchronization to an Asian monsoon record. We observe maximum 'natural' (pre-anthropogenic forcing) sea-level rise rates below 2 m per century following periods with up to twice present-day ice volumes, and substantially higher rise rates for greater ice volumes. We also find that maximum sea-level rise rates were attained within 2 kyr of the onset of deglaciations, for 85% of such events. Finally, multivariate regressions of orbital parameters, sea-level and monsoon records suggest that major meltwater pulses account for millennial-scale variability and insolation-lagged responses in Asian monsoon records.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 325 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 25%
Researcher 65 19%
Student > Master 28 8%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Professor 18 5%
Other 58 17%
Unknown 59 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 167 50%
Environmental Science 29 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 1%
Arts and Humanities 5 1%
Other 25 7%
Unknown 89 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 146. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#233,863
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#3,492
of 46,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,378
of 252,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#26
of 659 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 659 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.