| Title |
Elevation of circulating branched-chain amino acids is an early event in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nm.3686 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jared R Mayers, Chen Wu, Clary B Clish, Peter Kraft, Margaret E Torrence, Brian P Fiske, Chen Yuan, Ying Bao, Mary K Townsend, Shelley S Tworoger, Shawn M Davidson, Thales Papagiannakopoulos, Annan Yang, Talya L Dayton, Shuji Ogino, Meir J Stampfer, Edward L Giovannucci, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A Rubinson, Jing Ma, Howard D Sesso, John M Gaziano, Barbara B Cochrane, Simin Liu, Jean Wactawski-Wende, JoAnn E Manson, Michael N Pollak, Alec C Kimmelman, Amanda Souza, Kerry Pierce, Thomas J Wang, Robert E Gerszten, Charles S Fuchs, Matthew G Vander Heiden, Brian M Wolpin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 72% |
| Scientists | 8 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 457 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 446 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 113 | 25% |
| Researcher | 88 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 83 | 18% |
| Unknown | 83 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 120 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 90 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 7% |
| Unknown | 106 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 211. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#187,926
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#783
of 9,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,672
of 264,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#5
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.