↓ Skip to main content

A hybrid absorption–adsorption method to efficiently capture carbon

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
A hybrid absorption–adsorption method to efficiently capture carbon
Published in
Nature Communications, October 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms6147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huang Liu, Bei Liu, Li-Chiang Lin, Guangjin Chen, Yuqing Wu, Jin Wang, Xueteng Gao, Yining Lv, Yong Pan, Xiaoxin Zhang, Xianren Zhang, Lanying Yang, Changyu Sun, Berend Smit, Wenchuan Wang

Abstract

Removal of carbon dioxide is an essential step in many energy-related processes. Here we report a novel slurry concept that combines specific advantages of metal-organic frameworks, ion liquids, amines and membranes by suspending zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 in glycol-2-methylimidazole solution. We show that this approach may give a more efficient technology to capture carbon dioxide compared to conventional technologies. The carbon dioxide sorption capacity of our slurry reaches 1.25 mol l(-1) at 1 bar and the selectivity of carbon dioxide/hydrogen, carbon dioxide/nitrogen and carbon dioxide/methane achieves 951, 394 and 144, respectively. We demonstrate that the slurry can efficiently remove carbon dioxide from gas mixtures at normal pressure/temperature through breakthrough experiments. Most importantly, the sorption enthalpy is only -29 kJ mol(-1), indicating that significantly less energy is required for sorbent regeneration. In addition, from a technological point of view, unlike solid adsorbents slurries can flow and be pumped. This allows us to use a continuous separation process with heat integration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 199 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 25%
Researcher 29 14%
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Professor 9 4%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 46 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 54 27%
Engineering 32 16%
Chemical Engineering 24 12%
Materials Science 6 3%
Energy 5 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 66 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#478,558
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#8,074
of 57,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,838
of 267,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#67
of 727 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 727 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.