↓ Skip to main content

Visualization of charge propagation along individual pili proteins using ambient electrostatic force microscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Nanotechnology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
10 X users
patent
3 patents
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Title
Visualization of charge propagation along individual pili proteins using ambient electrostatic force microscopy
Published in
Nature Nanotechnology, October 2014
DOI 10.1038/nnano.2014.236
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikhil S. Malvankar, Sibel Ebru Yalcin, Mark T. Tuominen, Derek R. Lovley

Abstract

The nanoscale imaging of charge flow in proteins is crucial to understanding several life processes, including respiration, metabolism and photosynthesis. However, existing imaging methods are only effective under non-physiological conditions or are limited to photosynthetic proteins. Here, we show that electrostatic force microscopy can be used to directly visualize charge propagation along pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens with nanometre resolution and under ambient conditions. Charges injected at a single point into individual, untreated pili, which are still attached to cells, propagated over the entire filament. The mobile charge density in the pili, as well as the temperature and pH dependence of the charge density, were similar to those of carbon nanotubes and other organic conductors. These findings, coupled with a lack of charge propagation in mutated pili that were missing key aromatic amino acids, suggest that the pili of G. sulfurreducens function as molecular wires with transport via delocalized charges, rather than the hopping mechanism that is typical of biological electron transport.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 213 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 26%
Researcher 47 21%
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Professor 14 6%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 32 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 18%
Chemistry 35 15%
Engineering 32 14%
Physics and Astronomy 22 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 43 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
#370,074
of 24,943,708 outputs
Outputs from Nature Nanotechnology
#340
of 3,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,699
of 265,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Nanotechnology
#9
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,943,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.