↓ Skip to main content

Crowdsourced analysis of clinical trial data to predict amyotrophic lateral sclerosis progression

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biotechnology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
130 X users
patent
2 patents
weibo
2 weibo users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Crowdsourced analysis of clinical trial data to predict amyotrophic lateral sclerosis progression
Published in
Nature Biotechnology, November 2014
DOI 10.1038/nbt.3051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Küffner, Neta Zach, Raquel Norel, Johann Hawe, David Schoenfeld, Liuxia Wang, Guang Li, Lilly Fang, Lester Mackey, Orla Hardiman, Merit Cudkowicz, Alexander Sherman, Gokhan Ertaylan, Moritz Grosse-Wentrup, Torsten Hothorn, Jules van Ligtenberg, Jakob H Macke, Timm Meyer, Bernhard Schölkopf, Linh Tran, Rubio Vaughan, Gustavo Stolovitzky, Melanie L Leitner

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease with substantial heterogeneity in its clinical presentation. This makes diagnosis and effective treatment difficult, so better tools for estimating disease progression are needed. Here, we report results from the DREAM-Phil Bowen ALS Prediction Prize4Life challenge. In this crowdsourcing competition, competitors developed algorithms for the prediction of disease progression of 1,822 ALS patients from standardized, anonymized phase 2/3 clinical trials. The two best algorithms outperformed a method designed by the challenge organizers as well as predictions by ALS clinicians. We estimate that using both winning algorithms in future trial designs could reduce the required number of patients by at least 20%. The DREAM-Phil Bowen ALS Prediction Prize4Life challenge also identified several potential nonstandard predictors of disease progression including uric acid, creatinine and surprisingly, blood pressure, shedding light on ALS pathobiology. This analysis reveals the potential of a crowdsourcing competition that uses clinical trial data for accelerating ALS research and development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 130 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Unknown 241 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 20%
Student > Master 34 14%
Other 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Other 53 21%
Unknown 23 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 11%
Computer Science 25 10%
Neuroscience 17 7%
Other 49 20%
Unknown 41 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#233,386
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#493
of 8,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,226
of 275,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#9
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.